Of the People, By the People, For the People.
- 1 day ago
- 7 min read
Over 85,000 researchers of Indian origin work abroad—not because they lack ambition, but because the domestic R&D ecosystem cannot absorb, fund, or reward their potential. A democracy that exports its most educated minds while claiming to invest in its own future has not yet reconciled Lincoln’s promise with its practice.
By Sanjai Jalla
India calls itself the world’s largest democracy. Lincoln’s phrase echoes in every Independence Day speech. Yet when it comes to the single investment that most determines a nation’s future- Research & Development- the people have no seat at the table. Not as funders, not as beneficiaries, not even as a unit of measurement.
India spends roughly $55 (PPP) per person per year on R&D. The world’s largest democracy, home to 1.4 billion minds, bets less than the price of a movie ticket- per citizen, per year- on the knowledge that will determine whether those minds lead the world or assemble goods designed elsewhere.
AT A GLANCE — R&D PER CAPITA (PPP USD, 2023)
Country | R&D Per Capita (PPP $) | Ratio vs India |
🇮□ India | $55 | 1 : 1 (baseline) |
China | $650 | 1 : 12 |
Germany | $1,850 | 1 : 34 |
Country | R&D Per Capita (PPP $) | Ratio vs India |
OECD Average | $1,584 | 1 : 29 |
USA | $2,850 | 1 : 52 |
South Korea | $2,779 | 1 : 51 |
Israel | $3,420 | 1 : 62 |
Source: DST India R&D Statistics 2022–23, OECD MSTI, NSF Science Indicators, WIPO GII
SECTION I
The Democratic Paradox: A Democracy That Doesn’t Count Its People
There is something deeply revealing about how countries measure R&D investment. Almost universally, the metric chosen is Gross Expenditure on R&D as a share of GDP- a ratio that compares a nation’s knowledge-spending to its economic output. It sounds rigorous. It is, in fact, a number that erases the individual.
A democracy that truly believes in its people would ask a different question. Not “what share of our economy do we spend on science?”— but “how much do we invest in the mind of each person we govern?” The per-capita lens is not merely a statistical choice. It is a democratic choice. It insists that the unit of moral accounting is the citizen, not the aggregate.
India’s R&D story, told through the GDP% lens, is one of quiet stagnation—hovering around 0.64–0.77% of GDP for over two decades. Told through the per-capita lens, it becomes something more unsettling: a democracy that spends less than ₹4,500 (≈ $55)
per citizen per year on research- the knowledge that will shape whether its children design the future or merely consume it.
Consider what that number means in practice. The United States spends $2,850 per person. South Korea spends $2,779. Israel, a country of 9 million people, spends $3,420. These are not rich countries spending on luxuries. These are strategically purposeful nations spending on survival—on the intellectual infrastructure that ensures their citizens will not be permanently dependent on other nations’ patents, platforms, and precision components.
Three Layers of the Paradox
India produces the world’s third-largest number of STEM graduates each year. It has sent missions to the Moon and Mars on budgets that make NASA engineers marvel. It has built a generic pharmaceutical industry that keeps millions alive across the developing world. These are real achievements—and they prove exactly the point: when India decides to invest in knowledge, it punches above its weight. The challenge is that such investments have not yet been made at the scale required.
Over 85,000 researchers of Indian origin work abroad—not because they lack ambition, but because the domestic R&D ecosystem cannot absorb, fund, or reward their potential. A democracy that exports its most educated minds while claiming to invest in its own future has not yet reconciled Lincoln’s promise with its practice.
SECTION II
The 25-Year Per Capita Journey: From $12 to $55—A Journey That Barely Moved
Between 2000 and 2023, India’s per-capita R&D investment grew from roughly $12 to
$55 (PPP). That is a 4.5× increase over 23 years. In the same period, China grew 25×. The table below is the story of a starting line and a finish line—and a country whose progress has been slower than its ambitions.
R&D SPENDING PER CAPITA (PPP USD) — 2000 TO 2023
Year | India | China | South Korea | USA | Israel |
2000 | $12 | $26 | $394 | $952 | $890 |
2005 | $20 | $66 | $630 | $1,097 | $1,320 |
2010 | $30 | $158 | $1,085 | $1,322 | $1,780 |
2015 | $37 | $280 | $1,505 | $1,564 | $2,100 |
2020 | $42 | $425 | $2,176 | $2,205 | $2,720 |
2023 | $55 | $650 | $2,779 | $2,850 | $3,420 |
Source: DST India, NSF Science Indicators, OECD MSTI, WIPO · All figures PPP-adjusted USD
FOUR MILESTONES, ONE TRAJECTORY
2000 | India: $12 | China: $26
India and China at near-identical per-capita levels. The divergence was yet to begin.
2010 | India: $30 | China: $158
A decade in, China has already pulled 5× ahead. India’s growth barely registers on the same chart.
2015 | India: $37 | China: $280
India’s GERD as % of GDP actually declined during this period. In absolute per-capita terms, it flatlined.
2023 | India: $55 | China: $650
The gap is now 12×. India has moved — but measured against its competitors, it has stood still.
SECTION III
By The People? When Industry Doesn’t Show Up, Neither Does the Future
In a functioning innovation economy, R&D is “by the people” in the most literal sense: private companies, entrepreneurs, and industries—the productive class of citizens—fund the majority of research. In the United States, 75% of R&D is privately funded. In China, 77%. In South Korea, 78%. In Japan, 79%.
In India, the private sector contributes just 37%. The government carries 63.6% of the burden. Budget allocations routinely go unspent. In 2022–23, the Department of Biotechnology used only 72% of its estimated allocation. Grant disbursements have taken 8–12 months, disrupting ongoing experiments.
PRIVATE SECTOR SHARE OF GERD (2023)
Country | Private Industry Share | Government Share |
Japan | 79% | 21% |
South Korea | 78% | 22% |
China | 77% | 23% |
Country | Private Industry Share | Government Share |
USA | 75% | 25% |
Germany | 66% | 34% |
🇮□ India | 37% | 63% |
Source: DST India R&D Statistics, OECD MSTI, Economic Survey 2023–24
The Brain Drain Equation: 85,000+ Researchers of Indian Origin Work Abroad
This is not a brain drain. It is a rational response to a rational signal. When a country spends $55 per person per year on R&D, it risks sending a signal that scientific talent will find greater opportunities elsewhere. Those scientists hear the message—and they leave. They go to labs that spend $2,850 per person. They do their best work there. They win awards, file patents, build companies. And India counts them as “diaspora success” while the country that funded their graduate education files the patents.
RESEARCHERS PER MILLION POPULATION (2020)
Country | Researchers per Million | Ratio vs India |
South Korea | 8,714 | 33× more |
Israel | 8,342 | 32× more |
Sweden | 7,930 | 30× more |
Germany | 5,360 | 20× more |
USA | 4,488 | 17× more |
China | 1,307 | 5× more |
Country | Researchers per Million | Ratio vs India |
Brazil | 888 | 3× more |
🇮□ India | 262 | Baseline |
Source: DST India R&D Statistics, OECD MSTI (2020)
Photo Source: Unsplash
SECTION IV
The GDP % Illusion: What the Percentage Doesn’t Reveal
Every budget season, the R&D conversation in India revolves around one number: 0.64% of GDP. This is presented as an aberration. And it is—but not for the reasons usually argued. The true aberration is that this percentage has become the entire conversation, crowding out the question that actually matters: how many dollars, per Indian, per year?
The GDP% metric is seductive because it appears to control for economic size. But it conceals a structural truth: a poor country spending 2% of a small GDP may invest far less per researcher than a rich country spending 1% of an enormous one. Percentage of GDP measures relative ambition. Per capita measures actual investment. In a democracy, the second question is the only one that counts.
GERD AS % OF GDP VS R&D PER CAPITA PPP USD (2023)
Country | GERD % of GDP | Per Capita (PPP $) | What % Hides |
Israel | 6.35% | $3,420 | Extreme private sector intensity |
South Korea | 4.96% | $2,779 | State-led industrial policy |
USA | 3.45% | $2,850 | Highest absolute pool |
China | 2.58% | $650 | Rapid but uneven growth |
Brazil | 1.21% | $185 | Mid-table, not celebrated |
🇮□ India | 0.64% | $55 | Stagnant for 20 years |
Source: OECD MSTI, World Bank, SSTI International Comparison 2025
The proof is in the arithmetic. China’s GDP per capita is roughly 5× India’s. So even at the same GDP%, China would invest 5× more per person. Add that China also spends 4× the percentage, and you arrive at the 12× gap. The percentage headline hides both multiplicative disadvantages behind a single, comforting number.
THE ARITHMETIC OFTEN MISSING FROM BUDGET DISCUSSIONS
Scenario | Result | Verdict |
India doubles R&D % to 1.28% | ~$110 per person | Still 6× short of China today |
India matches China’s per-capita ($650) | Requires ~8% of GDP | Structurally impossible at current income |
India matches OECD average ($1,584) | Requires ~18% of GDP | Requires income growth first |
The only real solution | Grow GDP + grow % simultaneously | A 20-year civilisational commitment |
SECTION V
The Reckoning: What $55 Buys—and What It Doesn’t
To understand what India’s R&D investment means in concrete terms, translate the per-capita number into what it can and cannot buy. $55 per person per year is approximately:
Two movie tickets in a tier-2 Indian city
One-tenth of an entry-level smartphone
Two minutes of time on a high-end electron microscope
✘ Enough to fund one clinical trial patient for approximately 3 hours
✘ One-ten-millionth of the cost of building a satellite
✘ Nowhere near enough to sequence a human genome
The $55 figure is not a spending anomaly. It is the cumulative outcome of policy choices made over several decades that have been chosen, election after election, to invest in highly visible public programmes and infrastructure projects—over things that are invisible: research, curiosity, failure, and the long patient work of scientific progress. The invisible things don’t win elections. They win centuries.
India’s ANRF (Anusandhan National Research Foundation), established in 2023, promises a ₹1 lakh crore corpus over six years—approximately $12 billion. Spread across1.4 billion people and six years, that is roughly $1.40 per person per year in incremental investment. Necessary. Welcome. And wildly insufficient, if taken as the full ambition.
For India to reach China’s current per-capita R&D level of $650, it would need to increase its total R&D expenditure by approximately 12× - from roughly $76 billion to over $900 billion (PPP equivalent). That is not a budget discussion. It is a civilisational choice about whether India wants to be a nation that designs the future or one that imports it.
The writer is an alumnus of the Faculty of Management Studies (FMS), Delhi, a Strategic Advisor, and an expert in environmental governance, sustainability, and the management of planetary crises.
